12/20/2012
Where the beejesus
I was
sipping my coffee in the break room this morning, trying to have a sensible
conversation with Abigail Greene, this hippy type who listens to Charlie
Parker and writes poetry when she’s supposed to be debugging software. She
always has earphone wires dangling from her head, and when you want to ask her
a question you’re better off emailing her than trying to get her attention in
real time. She’s annoying, I’ll tell you. Anyway, this morning she did me the
favor of removing the earphones so she could listen to what I was saying over
coffee. But when I think about what she said to me I’m a little offended
because, well, I don’t think I’m “controlling”. Yes, that’s what she told me. I
mean right out of the blue she interrupted me and said: “You know, Armond,
you’re very controlling.” Just like that. I can tell you it knocked me back a
couple of steps. I mean maybe I did go on longer than I should have about pet
ownership saving the world, but I don‘t think I was being controlling, for God’s
sake. Maybe I talked over her once or twice when she tried to butt in, but I
certainly wasn’t dictatorial or anything.
Although
now that I’ve has a chance to sit back and think about it, maybe I do tend to
be slightly overbearing—no, that’s too strong—maybe I tend to be a little
overly enthusiastic sometimes when I’m trying to make a point. I mean when I think I’m right about
something, really right, right in a moral or ethical sense (or both), where
there really should be no question, no argument to the contrary, well then
sometimes I may be a little more forceful—well, not forceful—that’s a slight
overstatement. What I mean to say is that you have to have an opinion, right?
And you have to support your opinion, right? And sometimes you have to defend
your opinion, especially when someone challenges it or makes light of it or
implies that you’re wrong. That’s what Abigail was doing, now that I think
about it. Of course she really didn’t say much, maybe four or five words the
whole time we were talking, but I definitely got the vibe that she disagreed
with me. You can feel it when someone disagrees with you; you can read it in
their body language and their facial distortions, the way their eyes shift and
their upper lip quivers and that tell-tale twitch of the nostril. I sensed all
that going on with Abigail while I was holding forth—no not “holding
forth”—that’s too strong; I was simply making my point to her in no uncertain
terms—no, that’s not true either; it sounds like I was refusing to consider both
sides of the argument (not that we were arguing), which I was perfectly willing
to do and am always perfectly willing to do—except of course when I know for sure that
there’s no possibility that my viewpoint is wrong. Well, then I’ll go to the
wall to defend myself—no, “go to the wall” is too extreme for what I’m trying
to say. You see, I’m very committed to my ideas, which doesn’t mean I wouldn’t
change my mind if someone came up with a good argument against them. It doesn’t
mean I wouldn’t reevaluate and reconsider and even go the extra mile to see the
other person’s point of view. It’s true. I’m a fair and objective person.
So, now,
thinking about myself in that light—as someone willing to compromise when
presented with incontrovertible proof that his ideas are wrong--I have to wonder
where the beejesus Abigail was coming from this morning when she said I was
“controlling”.
11/26/2012
11/15/2012
It was quite something. I am reluctant to describe it as life-changing, as
out of body experiences real and imagined tend to lend themselves to hyperbole, wishful thinking and exaggerated memories, especially in the near term.
Best to wait till the luster wears off. In any case I can tell you it
was an amazing journey, from beginning to end, each experiential
component building on the realizations and self-knowledge gained from
preceding components, until the lines between episodes blurred and
became one (yeah, very Buddhist). Up there it is huge, just huge,
and you couldn't help but see the absolute insignificance of your self
and your overblown self-perception. Unlike down here where we've
built vast systems of interference between who we are and the real, up
there there's nothing to block it out. It's right there in front of you
all the time you're passing through it, and, at least in my case, it became fully manifest
that the world I perceive is not the world that
is, and neither am I the person I take myself to be.
10/16/2012
10/08/2012
9/30/2012
Cyberattacks on Banks Threaten 1st World Security :-)
By
NICOLE PERLROTH,
New York Times 9/30/12
Six major American banks were hit in a wave of computer attacks last week, by a group claiming Middle Eastern ties, that caused Internet blackouts and delays in online banking.
The group said it had attacked the banks in retaliation for an anti-Islam video
that mocks the Prophet Muhammad. It also pledged to continue to attack
American credit and financial institutions daily, and possibly
institutions in France, Israel and Britain, until the video is taken
offline. The New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq were also targeted.
Security researchers said the attack methods were too basic to have
taken so many American bank sites offline. The hackers appeared to be
enlisting volunteers for the attacks with messages on various sites. On one blog,
they called on people to visit two Web addresses that would cause their
computers to flood banks with hundreds of data requests a second. They
asked volunteers to attack banks according to a timetable: Wells Fargo
on Tuesday, U.S. Bancorp on Wednesday and PNC on Thursday.
But experts said it seemed implausible that this method would create an
attack of this scale. “The number of users you need to break those
targets is very high,” said Jaime Blasco, a security researcher at
AlienVault who has been investigating the attacks. “They must have had
help from other sources.”
Those sources, Mr. Blasco said, would have to be a group with money,
like a nation, or botnets — networks of infected computers that do the
bidding of criminals. Botnets can be rented through black market schemes
that are common in the Internet underground, or lent out by criminals
or governments.
9/26/2012
8/29/2012
Tillich’s War
![]() |
Pine Cone |
Ich war on the mountain top waitin fer nirvanha
Along appear a girl all dress in whyte
To me she says whats you worry bout dady
I says nothing cep my bodys outta sight
wat? yer bodys turning loose yer me-my funkie
It wanna wrestle down you donkey kong
But tommy u as dervish as a monkey
Everthing u thought was right was wrong
I aint nuts so dryup greasy momma
Aint no more nuts than all that perple blood
If some of us is nuts its cuz all greasy sluts
an wristy cutdogs bunck n chewin mud
an wristy cutdogs bunck n chewin mud
Yep an den did I ponder areolas
Areolas dicks n ladies eggs
An the karkers march and rose all agin me
An drug me down with all the written regs
So what the gist o this ol fubble funsong
Where the meat in everthing we say
In trufe there be no uberfatal meaning
but ta blow the myth of meanin allaway
8/09/2012
8/07/2012
7/25/2012
The Gun Rights Tilt---NYT
The Gun Rights Tilt
The same trends that have buoyed public support for gay marriage and
marijuana legalization have also encouraged a more expansive reading of
the Second Amendment.
7/24/2012
The Harmonica Lewinskies, released their first album today. Listen to it here for free, or buy it if you've a mind to. Here's a coupla cuts:
7/23/2012
Olympic Fists of Freedom: 1968
7/15/2012
5/16/2012
Spain 1967 (On the road agin)
it’s still crystal clear
EspaƱa that year
I was out and as free
as I’d ever be
no family no things
the wind in my wings
the wind in my wings
untethered untied
alone on a ride
that took me inside
for the very first time
a pilgrim a rambler
a dreamer a gambler
a drunkard a liar
a lover of fire
free of god free of sin
without and within
oh jesus my friend
put me on the road again
oh jesus my friend
put me on the road again
5/14/2012
Note to Charlie Rose (re tonight's JPMorgan show)
So, Charlie Rose,
When you purport to examine a real “problem” by putting
“unbiased” “friends” of your own and the “accused” on your show, how the heck do you sleep
at night?
Maybe you don't.
More importantly, how can you expect us proles to believe what you beautiful people say?
Oh,
and can’t you please get away from Harvard Business School? Is there not a better, more ethical oracle?
Thanks.
5/02/2012
Word order: The internet as the toy with a tin ear By Lewis Lapham
But in which language does one speak to a machine, and what can be
expected by way of response? The questions arise from the accelerating
data-streams out of which we've learned to draw the breath of life,
posed in consultation with the equipment that scans the flesh and tracks
the spirit, cues the ATM, the GPS, and the EKG, arranges the
assignations on Match.com and the high-frequency trades at Goldman
Sachs, catalogues the pornography and drives the car, tells us how and
when and where to connect the dots and thus recognise ourselves as human
beings.
Why then does it come to pass that the more data we collect - from Google, YouTube, and Facebook - the less likely we are to know what it means?
Why then does it come to pass that the more data we collect - from Google, YouTube, and Facebook - the less likely we are to know what it means?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)